![]() In Part 1 of Driving Decisions, I talked about my experience as president of our homeowners association and the parallels between being president and being a PM when it comes to driving decisions. I introduced the first five factors to driving decisions:
What follows are the remaining factors to round out the 12: Read more at ProjectManagement.com.
0 Comments
![]() I recently had an epiphany about what four decades of leadership and project management experience has finally prepared me to do: I am now the president of our homeowners association. A bit on our HOA its board of directors: The board is comprised of seven homeowners who are elected to a three-year term. Four are officers (president, vice-president, secretary and treasurer), and three are directors. I have served on the board in years past as the treasurer, but this is my first tour of duty as president. We represent 24 homeowners, mostly in the 50+ age range. Many of the homeowners have winter homes elsewhere to escape the rainy months in the Pacific Northwest. It's a beautiful community, and by and large everyone gets along just fine. But there certainly are some disagreements—not only among homeowners, but between homeowners and the board; among the board; and between the board and external entities such as the city government. The disagreements can range from a homeowner objecting to a neighbor smoking tobacco (or other substance) on their balcony and a homeowner not complying with our rules and regulations, to major issues with the city or significant third-party providers like our fire alarm monitoring company. Most all of the disagreements land on the steps of the board, which is accountable for driving resolution. I liken some of the issues to working in a hospital emergency room; you never quite know when the next injury is going to be wheeled in. Read more at ProjectManagement.com. ![]() The waterfall purists typically crave structure, with a clear understanding of scope, schedule and budget before commitment and adherence to scope, schedule and budget through delivery. The agile purists typically crave nimbleness, with rolling waves of smaller logical work groupings and more frequent delivery. I’ve seen discussions on the topic devolve into shouting matches as to which methodology is the “right” one. In my experience, project managers generally prefer waterfall while engineers prefer agile. PMI has developed the Disciplined Agile® framework, which sandwiches three hybrid levels between the waterfall and agile anchors. While I think some of my agile purist friends might take exception to the Disciplined Agile® name (as if agile is an undisciplined framework), the way of working spectrum is a reasonable split-the-wickets acknowledgement that there can be peaceful coexistence between agile and waterfall. Now I’ve been doing this stuff for four decades, and have seen projects from just about every vantage point performing just about every role in my career. I am actually a fan of a hybrid methodology and have successfully blended components of agile and waterfall in delivering very high-visibility initiatives. In doing so, I’ve learned and implemented some tips that have helped me drive hybrid initiatives, as follows: Read more at ProjectManagement.com. ![]() In Part 1 of The 4 Building Blocks of Emotional Intelligence (EI), I focus on knowing thyself. A key aspect of knowing thyself is developing an action plan based on improvement opportunities identified from a 360-feedback evaluation. The nuggets you get from a 360 are crucial in helping you become a better-rounded PM. There is another great source to help you in your learning journey: your stakeholder’s values. Before we get in too deep, here is a level-set of who I include in the stakeholder universe: Read more at ProjectManagement.com. |
Topics
All
Reprints
Contact Lonnie about article reprints. Please specify article you wish to reprint. Backlist
See Lonnie's Amazon Author Page Archives
March 2025
|